Feeds:
Posts
Comments

What just happened?

Have just watched What just happened? with Robert de Niro, Sean Penn and Bruce Willis.

They were all brilliant, especially Robert and Bruce.  They were playing caricatures of themselves (I think!) and Bruce Willis in particular seemed to be in fits of laughter most of the time.  Sean Penn played himself as himself and was just very very cool.

It’s the story of a week in the life of a film producer (Robert) and while it is supposed to be a satire you get the feeling that it’s not all that exaggerated.  Gripping, funny, wry – a bit like The Thick of It, very much in the style of Wag the Dog.  Highly recommended. I’ve given it a 7 at IMDB

Erin Brockovich

Today I have made

Cranberry and pomegranate relish
Salted Pecan cookies
Harissa paste
Lebkuchen (1st stage)

I’m really quite tired

Hope

Still in Northampton, still not working much – the occasional thing from NZ, which is great, but I also need something here.

So I’ve signed up as a volunteer at the Northampton Hope Centre, which used to be known as the Soup Kitchen but not only is that felt to be a bit too negative but also they do more than provide food – there’s a clothing store, a computer room and other activities too.

I am really enjoying the humour of the people there. Here’s one conversation that still has me giggling:

Hope Centre User 1: I really enjoy cooking
Hope Centre User 2: Oh so do I, I like to make lots of different pizzas
Hope Centre User 1: Oh me too. Mind you, I had a lovely piece of salmon the other night
Hope Centre User 2: Blimey, how can you afford salmon?

short silence

Hope Centre User 1: five finger discount mate.

In other news…

I shall be going to NZ sometime in Nov/Dec.  I am really looking forward to it, I miss Wellington so much.  I will have a week on my own there on top of the week that A Certain Person will be with me.  We’ll also have a week in Sydney with his daughter and family.  I am not looking forward to leaving again, but let’s not spoil the trip dwelling on that.  Yeehah!

I now have my new glasses, indeed I got them on Monday.  I am so pleased with them.  Although my pathetic little prescription has been scorned by friends and family (+0.75 in each eye), all of whom have been wearing glasses of one sort or another for donkey’s years, let me tell you right now that even 0.75 makes a big difference.

Obviously I’m having to get used to putting them on and taking them off, and to carrying them around with me (need a bigger bag).  But I can see what I’m reading without having to strain.  I had no idea how hard I was working just to read an ordinary newspaper.  Let alone small print. The medical world will be relieved to know I can now read their titchy little instructions on that leaflet you get with everything.  As my good friend Ann has gently pointed out, I can see!  and I obviously haven’t been seeing, not for a long time, not properly.

The only trouble is I feel so comfortable in them that I forget I have them on and when I walk away I can’t see properly.  I gather this is normal.

There’s no easy way round it.  I cannot read small print any more.  I had my eyes tested today and it’s official.  I need reading glasses.

That’s it.  Life over.

I know, I know, they don’t actually say it.  This is invideous sensationalist journalism of the very worst kind.  You are being led to believe that 10/35 diagnoses of prostate cancer result in death by prostate cancer.

Shonky Daily Telegraph article

The chaps at The Visible Hand can explain it I expect.  Basically the 10,000 are not drawn from the pool of 35,000, they are drawn from all the people up to now who have been diagnosed and who are still alive.  Not to mention that they don’t actually state that those men died of prostate cancer.  They may have died from something else.  All we know is they died.

Hmph

The Take

I’ve just watched the final episode of The Take which has been screening on Sky.  A sort of English Sopranos, of course I had to watch.  Set in the 80s and 90s, it’s a series of four episodes and follows a pair of East End villains, Freddie, who intuits and who uses extreme violence to get his way, and Jimmy, who thinks and is, much to Freddie’s chagrin, more financially successful as a result.  It’s all bound to come to a head, of course, and it does, but not quite how you expect.

I was going to write that Freddie is a pathological murderer, and it’s true he murders easily, but pathological murderers don’t feel emotion, whereas Freddie is overcome by his.  Jimmy, on the other hand, finds killing distasteful but when he does do it, and he is pushed to it at the end, his murders are all the more chilling and grotesque, being thought-out and coldblooded.

Comparing to the Sopranos is obvious but only goes so far.  Yes it’s about organised crime and the effect on the families of the perpetrators, yes it is violent, yes the violence is how they do business.  But on the other hand, the families live, for the most part, in grotty housing estates as opposed to opulence, the women are key to the plot development, there is, surprisingly, more of an emphasis on the clannishness of the organisation than in the Sopranos.  Here two cousins marry two sisters, and their parents feature in a good half of the scenes even though they’re not shown to be crims themselves.  There are of course only 4 episodes as opposed to dozens, and British crime shows still seem to have a grittiness that the American shows somehow polish away.  The Sopranos is about how domestic it can be, whereas The Take is about how severely dysfunctional it really is.  Tony Soprano is a hero, really, whereas you would never call Freddy or even Jimmy that.

The series opens with Freddy coming out of prison after, I think, a four-year stretch.  He is set to build up his organisation again with the help of his younger cousin Jimmy who has always looked up to him.  It isn’t long before their different personalities produce rifts in the relationship and suspense builds as to who will come out on top.  Jimmy is clearly able to use his brains and therefore we must believe he will win, our social mores tell us so, but Freddie feels his way in to, and out of, all the awkward situations he is presented with.  And Jimmy doesn’t like killing. So you just don’t know, right up to the end, how it will end.

There’s tension, intense emotion, moody production and classy scripting.  And the acting is out of the top drawer.  All the cast are without exception excellent, but I will say Tom Hardy stands out as Freddy.  Freddy is such a pain in the arse at the beginning, and a horrible horrible person, and you never feel any liking for him, but by the end you want to know what he feels and how he will react.  I see Tom has been in Black Hawk Down and Band of Brothers and indeed Layer Cake but he is unforgettable in this.

Yesterday, in preparation for the final episode, I watched all the earlier three back-to-back, and I’m very glad I did.  First time through, I was a bit bored by the first episode, but Sky1 were very clever and screened the second straight away afterwards, so I thought (as I was supposed to think) that I may as well watch that as well.  By which time I was completely hooked.  I watched the third chapter the following week with intense concentration.  I got a lot out of that second runthrough, I like to see the plot building when I don’t know what’s coming, and again when I do.  I’m going to watch the final again to make sure I’ve got it right.

I’ve given it an 8 at IMDB, which is normally reserved for “I want to see this again” – I probably don’t, but it is far too fine a production for a 7.  My only quibble is, why is it call The Take?  I don’t want to spoil it for you but no-one is on the take, not in the corruption sense.  Things are there for the taking, perhaps that’s what they’re getting at.

Eating out in England is widely held to be an awful experience compared with like nations – expensive, mediocre food and poor service.  There’s no getting around the expense, and certainly I dislike the way so many pubs seem to have joined up with one bulk catering scheme or another so that, if you see it advertising “2 for £10″ or “2 for £8″ as you drive in, you can be pretty certain that the menu contains breaded mushrooms, hamburgers of scant differentiation, cajun chicken with mushy peas (what?), poached salmon and a beef pie. But on the whole, if you go to a place where the establishment chooses and buys its ingredients, you can be fairly sure they’ll be using their own recipes and might actually have some interest in what it tastes like.  Within these guidelines I haven’t had a bad experience, until yesterday.

I found myself on the south side of Coventry at 2.30pm not having had any lunch.  As you know, when you’re on insulin you need to have some regularity in mealtimes, and I didn’t want a McDonalds, and I didn’t want to go into town to any of my old haunts as that would mean parking and town-centre hassle.  The answer, I decided, was a pub, but I realised that when I lived at the University of Warwick I never went to local pubs and usually travelled further afield for eateries, to Warwick or Stratford, and I certainly didn’t feel like trekking all the way there.  In the end I decided to drop into the Old Mill at Baginton, a well-situated pub I had often wondered about but never gone into.

This is really another episode in my “You should never go back”  series, a fond memory has been tarnished now.  First of all I was frogmarched into a dingy alcove to a table behind glass partitions by a pleasant enough woman who appeared just a leeeeetle too flustered and uncertain – she clearly knew she needed to deal with me but the range of options was limited.  I suggested sitting in the more comfortable (and open) sofas but she was adamant that if I wanted to eat I should sit at a table.  Well OK. As it turned out she should have suggested I go outside which is where everyone else was, apparently, but that presumably didn’t seem right to her either.  I had a feeling that this would not be a great experience.

I should point out that the interior was dark, with dark wood tables, dark sofas, dark easy chairs and low ceilings.  Sounds like a normal pub you say, very nice.  Somehow the effect was dingy, the decor was of a modern minimalist style without the light, and not like a cosy old pub at all.  Anyway the pleasant but out-of-her-depth woman told me three times that someone would be along to take my order shortly, and in the end she offered to organise me something to drink while I read the menu (again).  When she brought my sparkling mineral water I ordered an asparagus, mushroom and brie pie followed by chocolate cake.

I have to say there wasn’t much on the menu that I fancied, all the dishes, even the lunchtime ones, were too heavy and elaborate for a simple lunch and I would have given my eye teeth, ironically, for some nice breaded mushrooms or poached salmon.  Still, the pie sounded nice enough, actually I had pretty high hopes of it.  The woman found a piece of paper and wrote down my order and off she went. I got the feeling she’d shove it behind the till somewhere and forget about it, but in that I do her a disservice.  Fifteen minutes later my pie arrived.

Most of that fifteen minutes was spent in observing some kind of bill cock-up being resolved.  Just thought I’d mention that.   Back to the pie.

The pastry was nice.

Underneath the pastry was a single large mushroom in a cream-of-mushroom sauce.  It was excessively hot, so much so that I thought “microwave,” and judging by how quickly it cooled down I am pretty sure that did figure in the equation somewhere.  Pulling out the mushroom to make it easier to cut up, I discovered some asparagus underneath it, and further poking around identified some vestiges of brie.  The sauce, however, was cooling rapidly and the more it did, the more it resembled Campbell’s condensed mushroom soup before it is diluted.  It was jelly-like.  It had no flavour, even with the brie.  It turned my stomach, actually, and I realised I’d walked into a Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmare.

I pushed the plate away to the other side of my table and waited.  And waited.  And waited.  All the while the waiting staff (geddit?) were carrying on their conversations at the tops of their voices.  “Did you serve that fruit crumble?”  “Not yet, I’ve a whole load of starters to do” “ooh my feet ache” “I just don’t like this new till”  “The new ones have a better screen” and so on and so on.  I was glad not to be the recipient of the fruit crumble, I just don’t think your dishes should be bandied about it public like that, they should be mysterious, and personal, and not one of a long sequence of tedious jobs for underworked and overpaid restaurant staff.  A young man, who had earlier been asked to take my order, but who had declined, at the top of his voice, because he was already serving someone else (?????) started filling up the cigarette machine at the opening of my alcove.  I said “Excuse me” several times, each at a progressively higher volume with increased acerbity, but to no avail.  He was too busy holding up his end of the new tills conversation, and besides, we all know how important it is to keep the cigarette machine topped up.  And when he had done that, off he went, presumably to do something much more pressing than serving a customer. Or maybe it was just me he didn’t want to serve.

I watched a couple come in to the pub all excited about the meal they were about to have, they quickly realised the bar person (the pleasant woman) was busy sorting out yet another bill cock-up so they productively spent their time browsing the menu, talking about the options, all with a bonhomie that genteelly but palpably dissipated as the bill cock-up dragged on and on and on.  The protagonists in that little debacle started saying things like “I tell you what, why don’t you take this from that and put it on that and that way we’ll be all square”  – when the customers have to come up with the solution you know the restaurant has problems – and the happy, hopeful couple decided to cut their losses and go elsewhere.  Meanwhile the waitress was walking back and forth with main courses, desserts and clearing used plates (but not mine) and not a single person came near me to check how things were going or whether I’d finished.

Half an hour went by.  With that glutinous mess on the plate in front of me. Yuck.

In the last five minutes or so I started to get angry.  As the waitress went past yet again with yet another heap of used plates I took a spare fork and rapped my table very loudly.  Rapped it so hard, actually, that I left marks on it.  This produced no reaction at all.  Another few minutes went by and a man who was clearly on the staff but not in the regulation black and white began setting tables in the alcove next to me, so I did my bit with the fork again, this time with all my strength.  This brought him round to me and he got an earful about how long I had waited.  Apparently no one normally complained (I love it when they say that) and he only helped out when they were busy (that was a good one – they’re so busy that customers are leaving without being served and he decides to set tables? nb there were four tables near me that were already set).  At around this point I said to myself “I’m blogging this.”   He agreed to report my comments back to the staff and he would get me my dessert and make sure (as I instructed him) that it was fresh and hadn’t been sitting on the side somewhere, congealing and separating into different degrees of ooze.

Give him his due, he brought out my chocolate cake within a couple of minutes.  The microwave had been put to use again on the chocolate sauce, but the sauce was pretty good for all that.  The cake was fairly flavourless.  By this time I just wanted to go.  Unfortunately I didn’t have the right money to just leave the cash and walk out, besides I didn’t know how much the drink was.  I did think about leaving without paying, they wouldn’t have noticed and it might have been days before they figured it out, but that would mean releasing the moral high ground, so with a sinking feeling I went up to the till.  A chap was being served with his round of drinks and the pleasant woman asked me if I’d enjoyed my meal.  I made a sharp comment about how the meal wasn’t improved by a half-hour wait between courses, more than that as it took that long for the plate to get collected, and she was very sympathetic.  The man was all ears, of course :)

Eventually it was my turn and I asked to settle up.  Table 11, we all agreed.  No record of it in the till.  She beetled off (I’m not sure what for) and came back and tried again.  No record.  Definitely table 11, she put it in herself.  No record.  The other waitress came by, went to get the ticket from the kitchen, and from the kitchen door she bellowed “Did you have the vegetarian pie?”  “No!” yelled back the pleasant woman.  “Actually, yes,” I said.  “Did you really?” said the pleasant woman.  Like I say, a sinking feeling.  Back comes the waitress, shows me the ticket and I agree it’s mine, they’d put it against Table 12.  She apologised for not serving me better, but you know, it’s very difficult when there are so many people outside, people don’t realise how busy they are when inside it’s empty and everyone’s outside.  So, I asked, are you understaffed at the moment?  Apparently not, but you know, it’s very difficult because, you know, people need serving.  Yes indeed they do.

It took about 10 minutes to get my bill paid.

Not going back.

UPDATE:  oooh, oooh, I’ve just found a picture of the table where I sat!  Mine’s that little table for two in the fireplace.

Whereas…

…I am glad about this

Diabetes

It’s been a long time since I posted about diabetes.  Since stopping trying to conceive early in 2008, perhaps it has been less important.  I won’t say I didn’t care so much about it, but there was less to do.  Everything seemed stable, whenever I tested my blood sugar it was between 5 and6, I didn’t have any lows, there was nothing to see and nothing to talk about.  Fingerprick testing slowed down to almost never, and I just kept on keeping on.

Until last September, when I had my annual Diabetes Clinic appointment prior to leaving for the UK.  Before you make rude remarks about how terrible the NZ system must be, seeing me only once a year, they signed me off for that long because my blood sugar was always the same, I didn’t have any lows, there was nothing to see and nothing to talk about (see above).  But then I had my HbA1c tested ready for this September appointment.  And it was 7.0

Now, 7.0 is an OKish score.  It means you’re more or less in control, there’s nothing to panic about.  But I was used to an HbA1c in the 5s, and that’s how I like it.  This was a shock.  I talked it over with my consultant, listing all the stress factors going on at that time (leaving partner, leaving job, leaving country etc) and he agreed that we would leave my meds how they were (prescribing me a whole load to last me till I got a doctor in the UK) and expect it all to come right again once these things settled down.

Meanwhile I have found that the Metformin I’ve been on all this time is causing me acute and painful diarrhoea, so much so that I avoid taking it.  This of course is a huge contributor to my raging scores, and I have observed that on the days I dare take it, the scores are lower (but not enough) but if I have any intention of going out or to the gym, then taking the Met is a risk, so I don’t.  I know it’s bad, but so’s the diarrhoea (although that would be one way to lose weight).

I was on a 6-month waiting list for a doctor in the UK from last August, and it was February before I finally got to see one.  And by that time my HbA1c was 9.3.  Which is disastrous.  That is, it’s higher than when I was first diagnosed in 2001, higher than I’ve ever been, and way too high.  I know that many people are diagnosed with scores in the 20s but I was supposed to be the poster girl of good control.  Not only was my pride taking something of a hammering, but my physical health was in jeopardy.

I don’t get on with the GP all that well but she did refer me to the hospital straight away, this meant a four-month waiting list but she did her best.  And today I had my appointment.  I met Dr Charles Fox who is the consultant, and a newly arrived senior registrar whose name I forget (he was so handsome I was distracted and didn’t hear the name).  So we talked it all over, he asked me if I thought that insulin therapy was contributing to the weight gain – I have often wondered if it is, since insulin’s job is to store excess sugar as fat, so it’s a bit of a no brainer :)   although in mitigation my previous consultants have said that hopefully the reverse mechanism, releasing fat as energy, will also start to work properly and I should lose weight, which did happen at first.  Anyway it’s obviously not happening now, so he’s put me on Glucophage SR (a slow-release form of Glucophage/Metformin) which should address the diarrhoea issue, and added to the mix a relatively new concoction going by the name Byetta.

Byetta contains exanatide, which prompts the pancreas to produce more insulin, and (I think this is right) less glucagon, and suppresses the appetite a little.  I’ve never liked the idea of going on drugs which provoke the body to issue more of its own insulin, on the grounds that we only have a finite amount and I don’t want to use mine up.  I checked this with the doc and although he didn’t exactly say it like this, the upshot is, as I understand it, I’ve lost over half my beta cells already and I needn’t think I’m not going to run out – I am – and in any case this drug won’t make the beta cells wear out any faster than they would have done if I don’t start this new drug.  He convinced me :)   besides, my current regime isn’t working and needs to be fixed.  Did I mention that I am putting on weight even if I don’t eat?

So this new drug makes you vomit for a week :)   and then you get over that and get more energy than ever before, and you start losing weight, and then you go up to the next dose and start that cycle again, and hopefully it all settles down after that.  He’s hoping for a 2% drop in the HbA1C in four months, I will be very glad to see that happen.  The Glucophage SR will also be having its effects by then and I’ll have even more energy and even more weight loss.  Yay :)

Will keep you posted

Compulsion

Wow, nothing for months then three on the same day. Is the title of this post an expression of my new-found bloggingness?  No, it’s a film I watched last night, it screened on terrestrial TV this weekend.

Compulsion starred Ray Winstone as Mr Flowers the chauffeur to little rich girl Anjika Indrani played by Parminder Nagra.  Ray needs no introduction, Parminder is well-known from ER and Bend it like Beckham. To cut a long story short, she swops a night of lust (his, not hers) for an escape from an unwanted arranged marriage – he facilitates the escape and demands his night of lust. From these uncertain beginnings launches an affair of increasing passion on her part, while he falls in love.  And of course it all goes horribly wrong.

Ray Winstone is a delightful actor.  He conveys this heavy, aging, loveless character with a hint of menace but who adores this beautiful Indian woman.  In the end he commits an act that is only possible out of true love or, perhaps, madness and you can’t quite believe he does it.  Parminder also plays well in this.  Her characters to date have been nice little girl-next-door roles usually with a colonial twist, but in this she is a selfish evil bitch.

I voted it a 7 at IMDB, which for me means I would like to see it again but won’t go out of my way to.  I rarely vote higher than this. Eight means I would change my plans in order to see it again, nine means I want to own it, 10 means I do own it and watch it regularly.  Actually I’m not sure I’ve ever voted 10, not even for Brideshead Revisited or The Godfather.

Phone woes

My troubled history with phones continues unabated.  Why can’t I just get a phone and use it till it wears out?  Actually, I have almost done that, I still have a Sony Ericsson T68i whose buttons barely work but which I have been using when wanting to keep my NZ phone number on as well as my UK one.

Anyway.  I had a Nokia 6680 which I loved and adored and indeed I blogged on it when I got it.  It was a bit of a brick but had a lovely large screen and comfy buttons, hence its size.  But when I went back to NZ last July it got nuked in Hong Kong (because I had an altercation with the security guard guy, I’m sure that’s the reason) and the microphone stopped working.  And although I had it assessed and it would have cost only $150 to fix it, I decided to get a new phone anyway, the glorious Nokia E65.  While I loved the 6680, I adored the E65 with a passion.  It was everything I needed in a phone.  It was everything I wanted in a phone.  It was a perfect phone.

Until, that is, I went to Sainsbury’s a couple of weeks ago and dropped my handbag in the carpark and watched a mean nasty horrible person drive over it with their bloody car.  I say they were mean, nasty and horrible because they didn’t even stop, the mean nasty horrible bastards.  When I picked up the bag I could hear the tinkle of broken headset pieces (yes!  my wonderful Jawbone 2).  I pulled out the E65 with fear and trepidation and it is 100% squished out of shape.  The screen has a nice green line down the middle of a black background, whether it is on or off, the slider barely slides and the poor thing will no longer lie flat on a hard surface.  Not a good sign.

So we are doing battle with the insurance folks who will assess what phone or how much cash I am entitled to and meanwhile I have bought the almost-as-fabulous Nokia E66.  It has the features I want from the E65 (push email, bluetooth, wireless lan, calendar syncing), is brighter, shinier etc, and, and has a GPS unit in it.  It also has, and I’m not so sure about this, that so-called funky thing the iPhone does where you turn the phone round to landscape and the screen magically rotates for you.  I’m not convinced this is helpful, I use the phone a lot in bed and when you’re lying on your side, your hand is at an angle and thus the wretched display keeps flipping back and forth.  I might just have to turn that feature off, I didn’t want it anyway.  It also does not, unfortunately, have the perfect slider mechanism that the E65 had – it is a slider, but not as good – and it doesn’t have the faux leather finish which looked great and, more importantly, stopped the phone sliding around in the car or on the edge of my laptop.

While figuring all this out I unearthed the microphone-less Nokia 6680 so I could at least text and receive email messages, and that worked a treat.  I resolved then, once I had my new phone for the UK, to keep my NZ SIM in that phone instead of the T68i, as I can check the voicemail and send and receive text messages which is about all I expect on that number now.  Today, I don’t know why I did it, but I tried ringing my E66 from my 6680 and leaving a voicemail message.  How surprised I was to find that my voice was heard perfectly.  I just don’t understand it – Vodafone NZ wanted $150 to fix it, I’ve left it a few months and it has magically fixed itself.

How do microphones fix themselves I wonder?

I grew up in Basingstoke, Hampshire, and I strongly remember how much we all, me and my peers that is, wanted to leave.  An astonishing number of my peers are still there, and not only that, an overwhelming majority of those went away to university or whatever and then came back.  The town obviously has something.

During our tenure there the town was remarkable mainly for, as the above Wikipedia entry puts it, “a large red brick shopping centre and concrete multi-storey car park.”  My school was apparently designed by the same architect and it too had high red brick walls and few exterior windows (but no multi-storey car park).  Anyway this shopping centre was basically an open-air precincted area of “walks” and “avenues” with accesses to the car park (the biggest in Europe at that time) at regular intervals.  Depending on your level of cunning and ingenuity you might find staircases or passageways that led you to the outside world, beyond the brick wall perimiter and into streets, with cars, traffic lights and stuff like that.  Inside, though, the precincts formed an artificial toytown where life carried on the way it always does on property developers’ drawings, with little broccoli trees, sunshine and people smiling in their summer clothes.  The drawings didn’t show the whiff of chlorine pervading the central square (underneath which was the municipal swimming pool) but that was an added extra.

Recently I heard how the shopping centre had been redeveloped into a wondrous symphony of glass and light and renamed “Festival Place.”  Let’s face it, just the name by itself is a winner over the old name, “Basingstoke Town Centre” which, while truthful and descriptive, lacked a little, shall we say, oomph.  And not long after that I found myself driving from Heathrow to Somerset and ready for a cup of tea, and I thought not only would Basingstoke make the perfect stop but I could check out the fandabbydozy Festival Place at the same time.

It was creepy.  It took me a while to figure out what they had done.  There were the little walkways, and broccoli trees, and people smiling the Stepford Wives smiles, and summer clothes, and chlorine whiffs all intact.  The walkways, on closer inspection, were in the same places and went in the same direction for the same lengths as the old ones.  They even had the same names.  Bearing in mind I hadn’t been there for 25 years, I found myself saying “and in about 10 yards there used to be Marks and Spencer…oh look, there it is!  and then there would be Argos….Oh look!  and then WHSmiths…right there!  and Boots…”

Creepy.  All they had done was put a glass roof on it and a new floor surface down.  Otherwise it was…exactly the same.Same old high red brick walls and narrow walkways, and the tiny amount of light struggling to reach down to you now has yet another barrier, albeit of glass, to get through.

I wish I hadn’t seen it.

By contrast, however, I recently went to the Bull Ring in Birmingham.  After the Basingstoke experience I was prepared to be creeped out or disappointed, but I had a day to while away in Birmingham and many fond memories from the 80s to revisit, and to be honest, there was nothing you could do to the old Bull Ring to make it worse.  It really was a shining example of appalling 1960s architecture.  Dingy, poky, filthy, tiny little shops, grumpy atmosphere, grumpy people, it was pretty awful.  So I was prepared to give the new development a shot.

And what a delight.  Glass.  Birch wood. Marble.  Light.  Lots of light.  One side of it curves around the church (St Martin’s in the Bull Ring) and the architect and developers had the foresight to sacrifice some rental profits, not put any shops there and just leave it as pure beautiful glass, so you can see out over the church.  Inspired.  It’s not completely covered, it’s a mixture of indoor malls and outdoor precincted areas, but gorgeous, man, gorgeous.  And I saw it in typical Birmingham drizzly rain, and I loved it.

Older Posts »